Breaking the 4 biggest myths about the EV transition

The 4 biggest myths still slowing down the EV transition
Why companies still hesitate to switch to electric mobility — and why those doubts are often based on outdated information.
The transition to electric company cars still raises many questions among fleet managers. And honestly, the amount of — sometimes conflicting — information out there doesn’t make things any easier.
The result? Persistent myths that prevent companies from embracing electric mobility with confidence.
At Blossom, we notice that four myths keep resurfacing in conversations with Belgian companies. Myths that are often based on outdated assumptions or misconceptions about how EV management really works today.
It’s time to break them down, one by one.
Myth 1: “Reimbursing EV charging is too complicated”
The concern
“Some employees have a driveway and an expensive energy supplier, while others live in an apartment. It’s unfair to reimburse only home charging or public charging. And the administrative workload? That will become a nightmare.”
The reality
This concern may have been valid five years ago, but today it’s largely outdated.
Thanks to the current CREG tariff regulation, everyone is reimbursed at the same rate per kWh, regardless of their energy contract. That makes home charging just as transparent as the traditional mileage reimbursement system.
On top of that, modern charging systems automate most reimbursements. The administrative effort is comparable to what companies are already used to with fuel cards.
There are also plenty of charging solutions available for different living situations, meaning employees are no longer dependent on a single charging method.
Our advice
Keep it simple with a uniform and inclusive charging policy that combines home charging, office charging, and public charging.
And always follow the reimbursement guidelines and regulations set by the relevant authorities. That way, you avoid unnecessary discussions and administrative complexity.
Myth 2: “Charging at the office is the cheapest option”
The concern
“We already have charging stations at the office, where electricity costs less. Why would we also offer home charging?”
The reality
That reasoning doesn’t take the full picture into account.
With hybrid working now the norm, many employees only come to the office two or three days a week. As a result, office charging alone is often insufficient for daily mobility needs.
In addition, the initial investment in office charging infrastructure is frequently underestimated — especially when companies over-dimension their setup.
To truly understand charging costs, companies need to look at the complete Total Cost of Use (TCU).
More importantly, flexibility encourages smarter charging behaviour.
When employees have multiple charging options, they charge when necessary — not preventively or out of uncertainty.
Our advice
Office charging remains an important pillar of your charging strategy and helps control your TCU.
But it should complement home charging, not replace it. Together, both solutions create the flexibility employees need.
Myth 3: “The regulations are too volatile to make decisions now”
The concern
“If we invest in a system today, it may no longer be compliant or optimal tomorrow. Better to wait a little longer.”
The reality
Waiting often costs companies more than taking action.
The main fiscal advantages are already legally secured until 2026, while broader regulatory trends are becoming increasingly clear.
Companies can also choose solutions today that are independent of specific infrastructure or regulatory frameworks.
Organizations that start now build operational experience faster and create a competitive advantage in areas such as:
- residual value
- employer branding
- internal expertise
- operational efficiency
By learning early, companies can scale their electrification strategy far more efficiently later on.
Our advice
Waiting is often the most expensive choice.
Choose a partner that evolves alongside your organization — both in hardware and software — so you’re ready for future changes.
Myth 4: “My employees don’t want an electric car”
The concern
“Employees are attached to their current vehicles and flexibility. EVs come with limitations they don’t want.”
The reality
Well-managed EV transitions often increase employee satisfaction.
Electric vehicles are quieter, more comfortable, and more technologically advanced than many traditional cars. In addition, many drivers experience home charging as a major convenience upgrade.
In most cases, the real resistance doesn’t come from the EV itself — it comes from uncertainty.
Employees who don’t understand:
- how charging works
- how reimbursements are handled
- where to go with questions
- or what the impact will be on their daily routine
will naturally feel hesitant about the transition.
A clear car policy and proper guidance remove much of that uncertainty.
Our advice
Communication is key.
Work with a clear car policy and transparent agreements that address employees’ questions and concerns.
The expertise of specialized partners also helps build trust and support throughout the organization.
From myth to reality
Breaking down these myths is more than a theoretical exercise.
It’s about removing the barriers that still prevent companies from confidently embracing the electric transition.
At Blossom, we help companies simplify that journey every day — with solutions that replace complexity with clarity and uncertainty with control.
The shift to electric mobility doesn’t have to feel overwhelming.
With the right information, the right tools, and the right partner, it becomes a logical next step in your mobility strategy.
Discover how Blossom can help
Curious how Blossom can help your organization leave these myths behind for good?
Discover how simple smart electric fleet management can be today.




